Visit Our New Project Site

Documentation for Fake News Fitness 2.0 can be found here: docs.fakenewsfitness.org

The Communicator

Jake's picture Submitted by Jake Fri, 09/08/2017 - 13:27
Basic Information
Page URL: 
https://www.chscommunicator.com/opinion/2016/04/18/the-case-against-fracking/
Domain Name (domain.tld): 
http://chscommunicator.com
Common Top Level Domain (TLD): 
com
Article Author: 
Matty Hack
Dateline or Post Date: 
No dates found. Enter if you find one.
Clickbait
Headline Match: 
Headline Matches Article
Clickbait Rank (1 = not, 3 = clickbait): 
1
Ad Content Ratio (1 = no ads, 5 = too many ads): 
1
Support for Claims
Source Links: 
http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/our-energy-choices/coal-and-other-fossil-fuel…
https://www.revealnews.org/article/hey-california-oklahoma-had-3-times-as-many-e…
https://twitter.com/ourcarbon/status/661567035713818625/photo/1
http://energyclub.stanford.edu/perspectives-on-u-s-natural-gas-resources/
http://www.greenpeace.org/usa/new-science-shows-fracking-contaminates-groundwate…
Bias
Bias Level (1 = none, 3 = high): 
2
Your Bias (1 = high anti, 3 = neutral, 5 = high pro): 
1
Website Purpose

Vertical Tabs

Registrant Name: 
[If you know who owns this site, enter them here]
Overall Analysis
Trust Markers: 
Chart showing us how many earthquakes central mass has had from 1973 - January 2016 Good info and proven by professionals. Callouts Good text to ad ratio
Mistrust Markers: 
Not a lot of comments
Trust Rank (1 = high mistrust, 5 = high trust): 
3
Reason for Trust Rank: 

I dont really trust or distrust the website since I have never used it so I didnt know wether it was real or not so I didnt think it was real or fake coming into this fake news website. I believe the website is actually real but I am not sure if it is 100% real.

like
0

Comments

Anthony

Fri, 09/22/2017 - 09:35

You say you do not trust the site or trust it due to you never using it. If you never used the Time website would that mean the first time you use it you feel the same way on how you used this site, even when this site has multiple links to articles to support their claims? Where is the evidence of bias to make its rank a 2? 

http://www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/our-energy-choices/coal-and-other-fos......

This is just one of the links from the site supporting the arguments. There was evidence given supporting the claim of the source. 

 

Rating: 
0
No votes yet
like
0