Visit Our New Project Site

Documentation for Fake News Fitness 2.0 can be found here: docs.fakenewsfitness.org

All Page Checks

Trust Rank (1 = Mistrust): 5

I trust this article because it was posted by the Washington Post which is a credible source.

by: Sarah
Posted: 10/30/2020 - 11:47
Trust Rank (1 = Mistrust): 1
If there is some truth in this article, it seems to be few and far between.
by: Benny
Posted: 04/28/2017 - 12:58
Trust Rank (1 = Mistrust): 2
Seems as though it is a credible source. There are lots of links attached to claims, although it is a biased source.
by: Kin
Posted: 04/28/2017 - 12:48
Trust Rank (1 = Mistrust): 5
The site is Trustworthy. It doesn't use click bait, it has lots of clickable links in text to support their claims, and the owners and it comes from an academic source.
by: Erin
Posted: 04/28/2017 - 12:45
Trust Rank (1 = Mistrust): 5
I think that this site is very trustworthy due to the reputable links, the H1, and the about the author(s)
by: Soleil
Posted: 04/28/2017 - 12:44
Trust Rank (1 = Mistrust): 3
Seems ok, however getting news from a website called PolitiChicks does not seem legit
by: Amy
Posted: 04/28/2017 - 12:42
Trust Rank (1 = Mistrust): 1
Article only has one link to a biased source, no H1, obvious bias in article. Site is not trustworthy.
by: Luci
Posted: 04/28/2017 - 12:42
Trust Rank (1 = Mistrust): 2

The title says that the White House provided enormous evidence of voter fraud, but there's no actual evidence in the story. No links to other sources. It seems to be pushing a certain viewpoint. It is a real story but leaves out details to push a certain viewpoint. Some mistrust.

by: Oscar
Posted: 04/28/2017 - 12:42
Trust Rank (1 = Mistrust): 1
Seems ok, however getting news from a website called PolitiChicks does not seem legit
by: Amy
Posted: 04/28/2017 - 12:41
Trust Rank (1 = Mistrust): 4
Should be trustworthy but fact checking the sources is a good practice no matter where you look.
by: Stone
Posted: 04/28/2017 - 12:41
Trust Rank (1 = Mistrust): 4

Looks good to go. Seems like they have a lot of reliable sources which I also checked and seemed trustworthy. 

by: Barnabas
Posted: 04/28/2017 - 12:43
Trust Rank (1 = Mistrust): 1
Article only has one link to a biased source, no H1, obvious bias in article. Site is not trustworthy.
by: Luci
Posted: 04/28/2017 - 12:41
Trust Rank (1 = Mistrust): 2
Overall, I think that you can't really trust the articles on the website. They may have some correct facts but I think they'll only write about what their audience wants to hear. They don't seem very formal and the website looks like something run by a teenager.
by: Jemma
Posted: 04/28/2017 - 12:40
Trust Rank (1 = Mistrust): 4
Seems pretty trustworthy
by: Maddie
Posted: 04/28/2017 - 12:35
Trust Rank (1 = Mistrust): 5
Seems very trustworthy.
by: Lydia
Posted: 04/28/2017 - 12:27
Trust Rank (1 = Mistrust): 1

It is fake

by: Karrigan
Posted: 04/28/2017 - 12:21
Trust Rank (1 = Mistrust): 4

Because the author doesn't seem trustworthy and is clearly biased on many topics I don't fully trust this article but I wouldn't say it's fake.

by: Ryder
Posted: 04/28/2017 - 12:21
Trust Rank (1 = Mistrust): 2

i dont trust it there making speculations without any proof

by: Jordan
Posted: 04/28/2017 - 12:22